ICarry.org  
 • Home • Downloads • Your Account • Forums • 
Navigation
Site Info v2.2.2
Last SeenLast Seen
Server TrafficServer Traffic
  • Total: 62,207,523
  • Today: 7,851
Server InfoServer Info
  • Oct 17, 2017
  • 07:04 pm CDT
 
ICarry.org: Forums

 Forum FAQ  •  Search  •  Memberlist  •  Usergroups   •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in

 
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
JTHunter
Corporal
Corporal


Joined: Mar 16, 2010
Posts: 545

PostPosted: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:08 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

As expected, "Q-ball" used his "amendatory veto" to alter this P.o.S. bill in front of him. He restricted magazines to 10 rounds, you could only carry one mag on you, plus a few other restrictions that I didn't get in detail.

_________________
“Small minds adhere to the letter of the law; great minds dispense Justice.” - - Oliver Wendell Holmes
View user's profileSend private messageYahoo MessengerICQ Number
MadJohn
Member
Founders Club
Member<br /><b>Founders Club</b>


Joined: Nov 18, 2010
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 11:04 am Reply with quoteBack to top

TJ, Does any of this surprise you? The devil is in the details and even more so by what is not being said. How long before permitting can really begin. There are specified course of instruction, when where and cost? How often? What ranges for training? where and range fees and again how often? Class size and how often will the class be offered? The logistics of this can be a real game changer. Unless you have an inside track or are "connected" the process could take two or more years for the average applicant. Only so many applicants are getting permits in a specific time frame and we are at their will when it comes to that let alone the cost.
View user's profileSend private message
KB9AMM
Member
Founders Club
Member<br /><b>Founders Club</b>


Joined: Mar 01, 2010
Posts: 329

PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 1:24 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

ABC 7 Chicago

The Illinois House has rejected Gov Pat Quinn's changes to legislation allowing the carrying of concealed guns. If the Senate approves it later today, Illinois would join the rest of the nation in allowing firearms to be carried in public.
View user's profileSend private message
bobthecow
Initiate
Initiate


Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 26
Location: Elgin, IL

PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:20 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

KB9AMM wrote:
ABC 7 Chicago

The Illinois House has rejected Gov Pat Quinn's changes to legislation allowing the carrying of concealed guns. If the Senate approves it later today, Illinois would join the rest of the nation in allowing firearms to be carried in public.


Senate approved it. w00t.
View user's profileSend private message
JTHunter
Corporal
Corporal


Joined: Mar 16, 2010
Posts: 545

PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:46 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Granted - it passed.

It is STILL a lousy bill but at least it is a start.

Now, the ISP has 6 months to figure out how to implement the law so it is unlikely that anything substantive will happen before this fall.

_________________
“Small minds adhere to the letter of the law; great minds dispense Justice.” - - Oliver Wendell Holmes
View user's profileSend private messageYahoo MessengerICQ Number
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Page Generation: 0.13 Seconds
:: fisubsilver shadow phpbb2 style by Daz :: RavenNuke theme by www.nukemods.com ::